bittah.com!~ just to clear one thing up - Page 4

Tribes 1, Tribes 2 and Midair gaming hub for the Australia and New Zealand communities.
We don't mention vengeance or ascend.

bittah:// Community / Safe House / 

Moderator: Super Moderators

Discord

54
Online now
  • Recent Topics
1 2 3 4 5

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 12:15 am

I can picture her taking it up the arse sideways. Dirty hoe
XU1
bittah doyen
bittah doyen
 
Posts: 4470
Joined: Mon Sep 26, 2005 10:27 am
[ignore]

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 4:45 am

wat a dizgrazze
p. close to wishing had not voted liberal
not even close to enough cuts.
deadpixel
bittah doyen
bittah doyen
 
Posts: 4492
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Bathurst
[ignore]

Post » Sun May 18, 2014 10:11 am

Deadpixel has Photoshopped pr0n posters of her on his ceiling above his bed.

Image
ImPaLoR
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
 
Posts: 4359
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:45 pm
[ignore]

Post » Tue May 20, 2014 7:50 pm

It is true, however, that progressive parties like Labor, especially, in Australia, and the Democrats in the US, have struggled to find a way to counter how politicians of the Right have freed themselves from the shackles of consistency and evidence. But for now, the most sound analytical approach is to ignore what the Coalition says and focus entirely on who benefits from its use of power.
http://www.crikey.com.au/2014/05/12/ign ... -it-helps/
So let’s start with the contention that “politicians of the Right have freed themselves from the shackles of consistency and evidence”.

There seems little doubt about this. We see it in regard to everything from climate change to austerity economics to Saddam’s weapons of mass destruction. Ideology trumping evidence. A veritable legion of right-wing commentators and journalists willing to say almost anything in the name of group fealty.

It’s not just that they have backflipped on the matter of broken promises, and are willing to give Tony Abbott a pass on something they would never have given to Julia Gillard and Labor. It’s that the whole piece is predicated on the idea that “cuts are necessary to re-establish the conditions for growth and prosperity”.

This in turn buys into the government’s claims that there is some sort of Budget crisis facing the country and that that is being driven by other crises, most specifically those to do with healthcare and pensions.

In other words, the whole contention that “promises need to be broken” is built upon a range of conclusions about the economy that are simply wrong. The alleged crises do not exist. Even if we wanted to be incredibly generous and allow that the underlying contentions are at least debatable, we would still have to note that they are not actually debated in pieces like that editorial. They are merely asserted. They sit there as the unexamined assumptions fuelling the whole “debate”.
http://www.kingstribune.com/index.php/w ... -australia

There's quote a lot of insight in this article about the current state of political journalism and the creeping conservatism of Australia which warrants thorough understanding.
punk
corporal bittah
corporal bittah
 
Posts: 2241
Joined: Mon Sep 09, 2002 9:51 am
[ignore]

Post » Tue May 20, 2014 9:08 pm

That excerpt makes it pretty clear cut: their assertions have no basis in fact.

at least until the mines run dry
philmarcracken
bittah doyen
bittah doyen
 
Posts: 4243
Joined: Fri Jul 05, 2002 10:01 pm
ICQ: 116531792
Location: RIP FTTH
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 5:46 am

Most govt bonds are purchased by the reserve bank danger

This is how the money supply is increased

When the govt "borrows" money it generally issues bonds to the reserve bank in exchange for currency

The reserve bank is federally owned

Thus the govt "owes itself"

Cool try at being a smart ass though :p
If the new money is then spent into the economy the result is a devaluation of the current monetary base due additional money chasing the same goods and services. This in practical effect is the inflation tax. Thus the government owing itself is really a means to indirectly tax.

A government like the Federal one in the U.S. can really take advantage of this mechanic because much of the inflationary effect (in reality the indirect tax) can be exported due to the high demand for U.S. dollars in international trade.

In Australia this indirect tax has to be more carefully applied less the value of purchasing power is eroded too quickly.

Of course it is not quite as simple as what i just wrote as there are other factors which complicate things, nonetheless the basic principle is sound.

Fiat currencies issued by the state have always enabled the state to tax indirectly. People are more likely to fund an increasing indirect tax due to not understanding its true source. In fact the state can easily misdirect discontent in favour of furthering other facets of societal moulding.

:)
JackBootedThug
Official bittah.com Chief Conspiracy Theorist
 
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 6:02 pm
ICQ: 5179150
Yahoo Messenger: Skinski7
Location: Banana Republic USA
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 5:48 am

wat a dizgrazze
p. close to wishing had not voted liberal
not even close to enough cuts.
A vote for a punch in the face or a kick in the head ought bring no surprise or regret.
JackBootedThug
Official bittah.com Chief Conspiracy Theorist
 
Posts: 1181
Joined: Wed Jul 03, 2002 6:02 pm
ICQ: 5179150
Yahoo Messenger: Skinski7
Location: Banana Republic USA
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 8:28 am

Wow it's a rare day I agree with JBT but ur spot on about the inherent inflationary pressure in the FIAT fractional reserve system

Eroding Australia's wealth one bungled monetary policy at a time

Interestingly the inflationary pressure only kicks in once prices readjust to the increase money supply , so it acts like some mass form of insider trading lol
whitewhale
bittah, jaded, anti social freak
bittah, jaded, anti social freak
 
Posts: 6549
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 1:22 pm
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 5:38 pm

it taxes savings. so it encourages people to spend rather than save. the classical liberal economists argue that production (which drives growth) comes from savings, i.e. the main problem with the US economy. at least that's how I understand it.

whale do you (or anyone) know specifically how much of the debt is bought by the Reserve Bank. I'm assuming at least some of the debt is bought selling bonds to private buyers. Is it not? (Not a Troll)
deadpixel
bittah doyen
bittah doyen
 
Posts: 4492
Joined: Tue Oct 31, 2006 4:32 pm
Location: Bathurst
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 5:58 pm

Not sure I can't find the info

Any new currency debt would have to be the fed, there are multiple bond types so possibly some private
whitewhale
bittah, jaded, anti social freak
bittah, jaded, anti social freak
 
Posts: 6549
Joined: Sat Jul 27, 2002 1:22 pm
[ignore]

Post » Wed May 21, 2014 11:28 pm

I knew there was something about money supply and inflation but I couldn't be assed getting into it. :wink:
danger
Not Marv
Not Marv
 
Posts: 2140
Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 10:17 pm
[ignore]

Post » Thu May 22, 2014 12:53 pm

Doug Cameron - shadow minister for Human Services.

Gives his 2c on 2014 federal budget and supposed liberal social engineering.
ImPaLoR
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
 
Posts: 4359
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:45 pm
[ignore]

Post » Thu May 22, 2014 2:40 pm

Coming soon! Australian prime minister, going down for corruption! Inturdesting....
Bash
bittah tardleader
bittah tardleader
 
Posts: 3370
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 10:47 pm
[ignore]

Post » Thu May 22, 2014 3:12 pm

Is he just saying words that people want to hear? I'm really curious to see any legitimate evidence arise. Perhaps someone's gonna go Cassius mode.

This is some basic bitch stuff from the Libs tho, issue whack budget (if no one notices, sweet, cash money gold mine dolla dolla bill y'all), rile the plebs up, they make themselves look retarded which makes the semi-plebs want to be even less plebby, sacrifice the token of evil to appease the plebs, have budget reworked into initially intended and still bullshit but comparatively "lesser evil".
Ragingmoose
bittah
 
Posts: 954
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2012 9:57 pm
Location: Townsville, QLD
[ignore]

Post » Fri May 23, 2014 9:34 am

:laugh:
ImPaLoR
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
PLEASE EXPLAIN!
 
Posts: 4359
Joined: Thu Oct 28, 2004 8:45 pm
[ignore]